About the Truth

Quite often there is huge discussion about The Truth. To be reckoned as truth, something should be proved; it should be visible, measured and it should be the same for all, no matter what's the nationality, race or even religion. Some people can't handle anything that is true for others, because that raises issue of a challenge; if something is true for you but not for me, which one of us is right?

Matters of religion and beliefs are substances that are not true for all, never. There is such a variety among people, that demanding one infinite truth is ridiculous. Where do people need One Fits For All -truth, why couldn't people just spend some nice time and discuss and learn about this variety? For example, just in case if there comes a bump later in life, to meet thinker alike?

Not even colors can be shown in a way that all could see them same. Different people sense different scents, tastes, see different visions and hear different voices - and what is there to argue about? Same thing could be realized very variable ways - and is there question of the sense, whose sense is better or more righteous than anothers? Or is the question of the matter, the issue, who knows the best what it is? For example clay; scientist know exactly what it consists and what kind of particles it holds. Artist knows exactly how it can be twisted and turned to become handful of joy in the kitchen or in decoration. Thinker could think thousands of issues what has happened to it before landing in front of him - and a poet could write those and other thoughts. Clay is still clay.

Matter of law comes tricky. Everybody should do the same, or at least avoid certain issues. These are denials of hurting fellows and children, keeping nature clean and holding waters in drinkable condition. These basics have ruled people from the very beginning in communities. Matters of truth, practicalities of everyday life and keeping some kind of order among human there are different kinds of laws that prevent people harass each other, in many ways. Function of the law is mostly protection, but who are those to be protected and by what kind of basis? Are the women to be locked indoors in order to keep them safe from rapists or are they locked indoors, so that men don't have to be embarrassed about having this kind of creepy creatures hanging around and seeking opportunity to make decent male citizens break the law of honor? Should women be locked indoors at all and why on earth are they, or should they be, so awful for men?

Consideration of "one law for all" and thinking of "who's going to order about the law" is a raising issue now that Putin and Jihadists of Isis challenge each other to fight for "who's going to be the master of the Earth Bedroom". Neither of them have bollocks to stay home and take care of the raging social and environmental issues before doing more harm by creating some more war - and more problems. Lousy "husbands of the society" go yelling to neighbours about their uncut greenery while their own backyard is filthy.

And where are the bases of the Honor? In the blood? In the respecting and silent women and kids? Having the thousand virgins after killing hundred civilians? In Kalevala I find honor quite different. Honor comes from the root; from the lessons and teachings of the ancestors and also the maternal line should be reckoned. All those issues determine quite a lot about who we choose for our spouses and whom we hang out with. Parents have a word, at least in inner dialogue, when the career is to be chosen. Ethics come from the family and also from the society. Subconcious levels do have a certain power; environment, culture and language bring construct to mind, what kind of basics there are ruling the life. What kind of standards are honorable and what kind of marriages could me made et cetera. People can choose to live among their own or they could move away, if the life is unbearable. Issues still stand in the DNA, they don't just vanish. People hide in their body a lot of information; what kind of stressful situations have there been or has the childhood or youth held some safety. I think honor is quite much about avoiding social pain. Own standards, social and sexual appeal define our relations a great deal.

People are free to choose the community they stay and rise their children with. They should be free to choose what to think about politics or sexual issues. They should be able to qualify what kind of person they sleep and share their dinner with - and yet many choose the one they're most likely ashamed of. There are lessons of "what do I want" and "what's my truth" and "how I'm empowered" that must be dealt with in order to become abundant and strong minded person. What kind of truths are there to be fought for and what kind of spouse is worth of protecting, which kind of ideals make kids appropriately raised? People should be proud of the roots, their spouses, friends and work they're doing. Because anything that is to be ashamed of closeby, is shame of oneself. If man keeps a woman he thinks is cheating and lying all the time, should the wife be kept or make amove of getting rid oher, getting better one? Same is about the husband - if one can't stand the Mr Bean on the sofa, better get rid of him too. Friends nagging about wrong values or stabbing in the back can all be sent away. They can choose better comapany as well as you. If work is constant pain in the ass, one is most likely to ruin the work and whistle away everything one has earned. One can only do proud and well something, that they can fully stand behind of.

People seem to be shared in 12 tribes, standing behind 12 truths overall. The structure gets thicker; there are six sacred issues people think Holy and care for these in variated combination and order. These 12 tribes have common problem. Three types of personalities stick together and try to figure out how to manage the everyday life. The people of the Sun and the People of the Earth can usually agree abou everything - for different reasons they can still manage the same style of life and same laws. And the third part is the "black sheep" eager to create new form for everything. New laws, new basics, new visions. Sometimes it's tender way of the art and sometimes it's an armed rebellion. People seek just one truth, because it would be safe, there would be "common sense" and same ideals for everybody. Quite small group can form chords, they're mature enough to handle other people's truths as well as their own truths. And a rare share are of those, who can see the variety and divinity of the truths; they're the key notes, who are able to hang out with everybody - only if people would stand the one, "who seems not to know what they want because no one can have it all".

Seeking truth is often very much of banging around in others' truths and realizing, that "this isn't it" and "neitehr is this". After a while there is to be found a group of people who have common sense, and new society can guide towards the source of the truth. When people find their own truth and can stand behind it, they're more eager to understand other peoples' truth. Before that kind of "enlightenment" people tend to fight over who's right. I wish it's going to loose - I can see a world that is led by Unicef, Red Cross and WWF instead of headministers and jihadists. One truth could and should be true for all - safe and sound, peace.